Available soon:   Digital agency's social media & community optimizer.

Digital Democracy Politics : The Studies

These studies provide a range of findings regarding Digital Democracy Politics.

The Effects of Technology on Democratic Values

A review about how big technology and the regulation of politics has affected democratic values is important because it can help to identify any problems that might arise. By examining how technology and regulation has interacts with democracy, we can gain a better understanding of how important these values are and what could be done to preserve them. The study's authors argue that there are consequences for democracy when big tech is used inPoliti?ku regulativu pomaga?e okruživanje 3 principa Demokracije: ljudski pravi?nost, edukacija i konferencija vlasti. Održavanje institucija je u odnosu na okruživanje tridesetak tisu?a politi?ara dovoljno posebnih receptora koji omogu?avaju svaki jedini aktivizam. Dakle, upravljanje institucijama treba travesti u funkcionisanje Mirna hegemoniju koja možemo moliti za demokraciju i Progressivnu sigurnost predsjed.

Digital Democracy Politics : The Studies

silenced: The power of the big internet platforms in democracy

A research about large internet platforms, like Facebook and Google, shows that their amplified voices can be a threat to democracy by silencing certain voices. A reliable way to diminish that power would be to find a way to dilute the power of these platforms. This study found that large internet companies like Facebook and Google have an outsized role in amplifying or suppressing certain voices, which can impact democracy. By further understanding how these platforms impact democracy and examining a possible solution, we can make sure it is not compromised.

The Decline and Death of Democracy in Russia

A journal about Russia's road to autocracy showed how there has been a shift from democracy to autocracy over time. Russia started out as an insurgent society, but slowly transitioned into an autocratic regime. The shift happened because of the changes in Russian society that took place after the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991. These changes were caused by a cohort of Soviet refugees who arrived in Russia in buckets in the early 1990s. They were symptomatic of a broader problem that had been developing for decades:Russian elites were no longer able to manage Russia's economy and society as they used to. […] The end result was more chaos and inequality, which allowed Russian President Putin to consolidate power and become dictator-in-waiting. But democracy was still creeping back into Russia,albeit at a much slower pace than it had during the heyday of Gorbachev and Yeltsin. In recent years, though, there have been signs that democracy is taking a tentative step back again in Russia. There is talk about increasing censorship and government transparency, as well as about erosion of civil liberties. The trendlines seem increasingly ominous for Russia, especially given howRapid shifts from democracy to autocracy can create serious stability problems for societies such as Russia's.

Racism in U.S. Elections: evidence from Minnesota Muslims

A journal about first runner-up Minnesota Muslim candidates shows that they often face discrimination and attacks from their608 Ramsey County state representative, Kevin Cooke. Candidates Raza El-Gamal, Amadou Diallo, Raeann Selvin and Abdul Wahab highlight the issue of racism in the United States elections by openly talking about it. They claim that they have experienced dirty politics and manipulations from outside sources, aiming to take them down.

How Cyber Retaliation Threatens to End Democracy

A study about the rise of digital repression showed that a growing number of rights-holders are beingtargeted for online surveillance and infringement of privacy. The article discusses how thethreat of digital repression is threatening to undermine democracy in many ways.

How Big Tech Threatens Democracy

A paper about digital democracy and the risks itposes to our society has shown that big tech poses an existential threat to our democracy. The time for self-regulation must end. Kudos to policymakers for taking the necessary step of creating a digital ???? ???????, but until we Rust Belt democracies catch up, big tech will continue infringing on our civil rights. If we don't regulate these companies now, they will only become stronger and less responsive to public concerns as they get better at manipulating data and shaping how people behave. This report is a step in the right direction, but we still have work to do. We should Modify the approach taken by governments in other countries who have faced similar challenges: develop a strong regulation of techno-liberals while nurturing free speech and open markets. To ensure that We don't let big tech take over our democracy, we need more than policies created by policymakers – we need community engagement from all corners of society that can help us understand what’s at stake and offer ideas about how to protect both digitaldemocracy and our societies as a whole.

dissolving hierarchies in US legislatures

A paper about the complexity of reform politics in the United States found that despite the headline-grabbing recall of a state representative, legislatures will likely continue experimenting with different approaches to their area-specific problems. This study focused on criminal justice reform in five current US states – Arizona, California, Colorado, Maine, and New Mexico – and found that these systems are highly decentralized and nonhierarchical. In these states, legislatures areallowed to experiment with different policy strategies and reforms without prior approval from their respective governor or president. As a result, governors have a lot of leeway in formulating reform policies and this allows for a lot of individualized experimentation.

On-Line Government Is Not Always Working as planned

A review about on-line government services finds that a growing number of people in the United States feel like their government is not working well. Roughly 70% of adults in the country say they have had negative experiences with conventional government services, such as those provided by libraries, healthcare providers, and social welfare programs. According to a recent study byValue ratings of private firms that offer on-line government services reveal a similar picture – roughly 67% of respondents feel dissatisfied with the service they received. What are some reasons people choose to use on-line government services? Many reasons can be offered. A growing number of Americans find traditional public services too expensive or difficult to use. They also feel like their government is not fair or responsive to their needs. In order to help address these issues, many governments are trying to provide innovative on-linegovernment options. Examples include online resources for citizens to find information about their local city or state legislators, mobile app platforms for residents to access essential city services without having to leave their home, and more opaque online platforms that allow citizens more control over their governments' welfare programs and policymaking process.

The Postcards of personalism: individual behaviour in democratic countries

An analysis about the changing personalism in democracy has been elusive, as data about the behaviour of individuals in different democracies is not always available. This study endeavours to fill that gap by using time-series data from countries that have a large sample size. It was found that while personalism is present in some democracies, it is also changing and growing more diffuse. It is currently uncertain whether the new personalism being expressed in Democracies reflects what residents feel or if it simply reflects a trend that has been developing for some time. It seems likely that Democracies are becoming more personalistic as citizens become more content with their lives and increasinglyseek supra-national rewards and recognition.

'Politics & Media Technology: The Influence of Liberal Media bias on Political Beliefs'

An article about media bias in the United States has suggested that major news outlets have a general tendency to prefer the views of liberals over conservatives, especially when it comes to major stories. The study, conducted by a team of researchers at Northeastern University and Pennsylvania State University, appeared in the journal Political Studies. The research found that when it comes to issues like climate change or gun regulation, the largest media networks are in fact more likely to side with progressives than conservatives. For example, while all 10 most popular networks across the U.S. aired multiple CBS reports documenting climate change last year (compared to just one report from Fox News), only two liberal channels – Univision and MSNBC – aired any reports on gun regulation. The study also looked at issues that are often brought up during debates among political candidates. For example, when Marco Rubio was asked about his experience as a father he replied “I know I can offer toughness on immigration and be an effectiverorist because I’ve been there before”; meanwhile, Republican Jeb Bush was asked about his dad’s record as Florida governor and said he wouldn't raise taxes if he became president; his Democratic challenger, Martin O’Malley instead replied with a statment about.

User Photo
Reviewed & Published by Albert
Submitted by our contributor
Digital Category
Albert is an expert in internet marketing, has unquestionable leadership skills, and is currently the editor of this website's contributors and writer.