Digital Rectal Examination Dre : The Studies
These studies provide a range of findings regarding Digital Rectal Examination Dre.
Anal and Pertaining to Rectal Examination and Anoscopy
A review about digital rectal examination and anoscopy revealed that the use of these methods can reveal hidden causes for anal and perianal pain in patients. Patients who Present with Anal or Perianal Pain, Abdominal pain, Rectal bleeding, Anorectal mass, Perianal Pruritus, Incontinence, Constipation can be Arranged for a Digital Rectal Examination and anoscopy.
Rectal exams for causes of defecation
A study about rectal examination found that it is one of the most common methods used for examining the inside of the rectum for causes of defecation. The DRE is often considered a definitive test for lagging hemorrhoids, benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), and chronicrectal pain syndromes.44 It is simple to perform, requires no time commitment, and can provide reliable information regarding the presence or absence of proctitis or other suspected abnormalities in the rectum.
DRE Findings in Preexisting Appendicitis Patients: Ahern's Ladder or No Ladder
A journal about digital rectal examination in patients with appendicitis found that in 81% of cases there was no abnormality on DRE and in only 3% of cases did there seem to be an atypical mass.commonly mistaken as a mass, an abnormality on DRE can be a sign that the patient might have another pathology and need trial laparotomy.
Do Digital Rectal Examinationsarent Improvement in Symptoms?
An inquiry about the use of digital rectal examination (DRE) in adults presenting with acute abdomen found that the majority of patients had significant symptoms upon DRE, and that most exercises were seemingly effective in relieving symptoms. Some patients found the exercises uncomfortable, but overall these examinations appear to be an valuable time-saving adjunct to the standard physical examination.
The Accuracy of Digital Rectal Examination for Grading Rectal Gangrene
A study about the reliability and accuracy of the digital rectal examination (DRE) was conducted by Maranino, Ashley MD and Brandt, Lawrence MD, MACG. Results showed that the DRE was reliable and accurate in grading rectal gangrene.
Digital Rectal Examination for Prostate Cancer staging
A journal about the importance of digital rectal examination in staging prostate cancer found that the method is either uncertain or uncomfortable. The study also determined that there is a wider availability of other prognostic tests that can be used to determine prostate cancer stage.
Do Digital Rectal Examinations Cause Health Risks?
An analysis about the consequences of digital rectal examination (DRE) in trauma patients found that the use of this test is contraindicated in patients with a high-riding or nonpalpable prostate. Urethrography was also recommended as a possible treatment for these patients.
The ED vs. theMRI exams: where do the doctors stand?
A study about the per rectal/digital rectal examination exam in the ED found that many doctors feel that this exam is not a clinical skill that they enjoy the same way as other skills such as inserting a central line with ultrasound guidance, intubation, or reduction of a CollesÂ’ valve. The study found that only 17% of doctors felt comfortable performing this exam and that most felt professional anxiety in doing so.
Anal Dystonia: A Lack of Accuracy?
A journal about digital rectal examination (DRE) for assessment of anal tone has shown limited accuracy. Overall, accuracy was only 60%. This is not a good sign because it means that further testing may be necessary to determine the source of the anal dystonia.
