Digital Rectal Examination Of The Prostate : The Studies
Digital Rectal Examination Of The Prostate is main topic you will see these studies.
Digital Rectal exams and Prostate-Specific antigen Tests in Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer
A journal about the accuracy of digital rectal exams and prostate-specific antigen tests in diagnosis of prostate cancer gave surprising results. The study found that when these Tests were used as the only assay for prostate cancer, 66% of cases were diagnosed with the disease, compared to only 41% when other assays were used. By using other assays, such as an MRI, this number dropped to 33%.
The Role of Digital Rectal Examination in Predicting Prostate Cancer Stage
A research about the importance of digital rectal examination (DRE) in predicting prostate cancer stage has been conducted. It was found that even without DRE, prostate cancer can be classified as a T2-stage if the Gleason score is high enough. The study also showed that other methods of prognostic staging are not as helpful as DRE for predicting prostate cancer stage.
Anoscopy in the Treatment of Emergency Rectal Bleeding
An evaluation about the effectiveness of anoscopy in the treatment of emergency rectal bleeding reported that 72% of patients treated with anoscopy achieved complete relief after suffering from rectal bleed. The study also found that 77% of patients who had anoscopy were responded to within four hours without the need for further treatment.
Did anal exams really decrease the diagnostic frequency of prostate cancer?
A study about the value of digital rectal examinations for assessing for prostate cancer found that the examinations were less likely tosignificantly misdiagnose patients with normal prostate function as prostate cancer.
The Adverse Effects of Digital Rectal Examination in Men
A study about the adverse effects of digital rectal examination (DRE) of the prostate was conducted in order to determine if there are anynegative effects that can occur. The study found that some men may refuse the procedure because they have had previous painful experiences with this procedure. Other negative factors include cultural barriers, fear of discovering cancer and embarrassments.
The Accuracy of Digital Rectal Examination for Bilateral Prostate Cancer Detection
An evaluation about the accuracy of digital rectal examination (DRE) for bilateral prostate cancer detection was conducted. DRE was used to test if there was a high-grade risk for developing prostate cancer in men with aggressive lifestyle factors (PCa risk score ?5). Overall, the study found that there was a high-grade risk for developing prostate cancer in men with aggressive lifestyle factors when using DRE. In addition, the study found that the accuracy of DRE for diagnosis of prostate cancer is not perfect.
Variations in the Size of a Suspect Nodule among Digital Rectal Examinations
A review about the different variations of abnormal digital rectal examination found that the biggest variation was in the size of the suspicious nodule(s). Out of all the variants, those with a bigger suspicious nodule had a higher grade of significance.
The Normality of Rectal Examination in the Emergency Department Patient Population
An analysis about the per rectal/digital rectal examination examination in the emergency department patient population shows that the use of a Normal or PR/DREE can be a very difficult diagnostic test to discern pathological from normal.
Male Genital-Rectal Exam: A Four-Category Approach
An article about the use of a four-category approach to the male genital-rectal examination found that absolute contraindications to exams were immunosuppressed clients, those with prolapsed, thrombosed internal hemorrhoids, or severe anal pain. The study also found that the method was effective in identifying prostate enlargement and/or the presence of nodularity.