Digital Rectal Examination Sensitivity : The Studies
We discovered that these Digital Rectal Examination Sensitivity studies are valuable as supplementary resources.
Anal and Perianal Pain relief with a Digital Rectal Examination: A comparative Study
A review about digital rectal examination and anoscopy for the symptom relief of patients with anal and perianal pain took place. The study showed that there was a significant difference in the relief of symptoms between the digital rectal examination and anoscopy. The study found that the digital rectal examination was better in terms of pain relief, while the anoscopy had better results when it came to detecting things like infections and anatomical abnormalities.
'Digital rectal examination and abdominal pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis'
An analysis about the use of digital rectal examination in patients with abdominal pain found that the pooled was 0.49 (95% CI 0.42 to 0.56), the pooled specificity was 0.61 (95% CI 0.49 to 0.72). This study found that this exam has a great potential to diagnose and get the appropriate care for these patients with the help of a specialist.
Predicting Prostate Cancer with Rectal Examination
A review about the rectal examination in primary care found that it has a high sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing prostate cancer, with a positive predictive value of 42%. Evaluation of the prostate gland consists of a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) serum level and a (DRE) of the gland.
New EHR Practice Guidelines Urge Rectal and Digital Rectal Enameling in the ED Population
A study about the effectiveness of the rectal/digital rectal examination exam in the emergency department (ED) population found that the test was not very effective in detecting pathological versus normal conditions and is especially not successful in yielding results. This study suggests that per rectal/digital rectal examination should only be used as a last resort when there are other more comprehensive measures available to seek improvement in the patients condition.
Prostate cancer screenings increased by 72% in accuracy
A study about the diagnostic accuracies of prostate cancer screenings has been conducted. The study found that, among men age 50 or older, the accuracy of prostate cancer diagnosis is 72%. This increase in accuracy potentially has a huge impact not just on the quality of life for men with prostate cancer but also on costs and the overall incidence of the disease.
Pediatric Rectal Exams in constipation: A Time-Study
A journal about the performance of a rectal exam for constipation by a pediatrician before referral revealed that only in 16% of children does the examination reveal problems with fecal impaction, anal fissure, hard stool, or an empty ampulla. Additionally, the study found that there were only four cases of anterior anal displacement among the 702 children studied.
Digital rectal examination classifications can be unreliable and uncomfortable
A journal about the usefulness of digital rectal examination classifications in the staging of prostate cancer found that these techniques are not always accurate and can be quite discomforting. The study also found that other assays, such as a PSA scan, are much more reliable for predicting long-term health outcomes.
podiatric digital rectal examination: accuracy and specificity
A study about the accuracy of digital rectal examination to predict prostate size was conducted. The study showed a high correlation between PV and DRE, but had a low specificity for PV. The study also found that the use of DRE did not increase the accuracy of predicting PV.
Prostate Cancer: The Wrong Diagnosis
A paper about the accuracy of the rectal examination in the diagnosis of prostate cancer has been conducted over a period of 20 years. The results show that the rectal examination is an inaccurate tool for diagnosing prostate cancer. The examination can be powerful but it should not be relied on to diagnose prostate cancer.