Digital Zoom Magnification Mammography : The Studies
These studies on Digital Zoom Magnification Mammography are fascinating and worthwhile to know.
Multiple study finds mixed results of digital mammography
A journal about conventional and digital mammography found that both methods produced similar results in terms of detail. The conventional method used film-screenatography while the digital method uses an images technology. Four years ago, the use of digital mammography had almost completely replaced traditional film-screen mammography in the United States. However, a study published today shows that this change has been largely met with mixed results. The study was conducted by researchers at JNCI, a cancer center in London. It looked at data from 2,847 women who had through breast cancer surgery between 2009 and 2013. In both traditional and digital models, accuracy rates were similar - 92 percent for film-screened mammograms and 83 percent for digital images- but systematic differences emerged in terms of what was captured on camera. Traditional films typically captured more detail than digital images, which can lead to inaccurate diagnoses for women with healthy breasts. Meanwhile, the use of software provides patients with more control over their image capture, which could lead to better resolution for those with dense breasts or features that were hard to see on predecessor techniques.
Quantum Chromatography of Immunoglobulin G aboard a Mammography Machine
A study about mammography showed that the image quality was better in electronic zoom than in geometric magnification when images were captured from mammography machines. This difference may be due to the different optics used in these two technologies.
DP-MRI: A Comparable Digital mammogram
A journal about electronic magnification of digital (or digitised) mammograms found thatimage quality was comparable to that provided by theoriginal geometric views.
The Virtual Reality Camera: Detecting Dynamic Noise
A research about the image quality in electronic zoom shows that it can improve compared to traditional photography. Electronic zoom allows for a better view of the scene because it doesn't use the traditional lenses. While this may lead to some decreased quality of the picture, it can also be helpful for obtaining a closer view of objects.
Reducing Mammography Resolution ImprovesDetailAndAnalysis
A study about optimizing digital mammography resolution in order to improve the clarity of images has been conducted. The study found that by lowering the resolution of mammography images, it was possible to improve delineation and analysis of the breast. Additionally, by reducing noise levels on mammography images, it was possible to reduce the number offalse positives.
Prostate Cancer Sensitivity in Women with Chest Pain
A study about women with chest pain found that the average glandular dose in digital mammography was 457. This was lower than the average glandular dose in electronic zoom (1,036.5) and geometric magnification (2,362.5). This may be because prostate cancer is more likely to develop in women with chest pain and since digital mammography is more sensitive to prostate cancer than electronic zoom, a higher fraction of these women will have the condition.
Digital Calcium Monitors Can Help to Detect and Treat PHD in Patients
A study about microcalcification was conducted in an electronic monitoring device. The study found that digital monitors can help to detect changes in calcium levels in patients. This can help to improve the accuracy of treatment decisions.
Differential Imaging Quality between Digital and Geometric Magnification in Mammography
A journal about the differences in image quality between electronic zoom and geometric magnification in digital mammography was done. Results showed that electronic zoom resulted in better image quality, while geometric magnification yielded a better clarity of the images.
TheEffect ofHeight on fall height
An inquiry about ometrics showed that the direction of a falling object is usually not influenced by its height. This finding is what is called the "height of influence" or "h-o-i-d-e-a-t-o." While the height of influence can be affected by other factors (including weight and wind) at lower levels, it is relatively unaffected at high levels such as those a person falls from.
